12 23Sun05192013

Settings

Font Size

Back Opinion Do facts still matter?

Do facts still matter?

  • PDF

“POLITICS ain’t beanbag,” it is often said. Whichever side you’re on, if you want to run for an elected office, you can expect your life to be an open book, and for your opponents to try and twist every last one of your words and deeds to their own advantage.

It comes with the turf.

If you are asking your fellow citizens – be it of Guam or the U.S. mainland – to hire you to be their senator, congressperson or president, you have to be willing to put yourself through one heck of a job interview process. You’d better be ready to convince a plurality of them that you have the intelligence, integrity and ideas to be a leader.

If you’re a voter, you’d better be ready to wade through a mountain of distortion, spin, empty promises, and just plain nonsense to discern what the candidates are really thinking, and what impact their plans might have on your life ... and that of the nation (or island).

That’s the way it’s always been in American democracy, and – on the whole – it’s served us pretty well.

I’d like to say that this is the way it’s always going to be ... but something is different now.

In a recent speech, President Obama said, “You can’t just make stuff up.” But that is exactly what more and more people are doing nowadays.

Not terribly long ago, candidates and their surrogates used to spin, distort, puff up and obfuscate to their heart's content, but it was done on top of a basic bedrock of facts. Outright lies and complete distortions were told, but when someone was caught, they generally paid a price in terms of their credibility.

Not any more.

And let’s call it like it is. People on the left are doing their share of distortion and spin, but the willingness to put out completely fact-free nonsense – and stand by it – is coming almost exclusively from the right.

Let’s look at a few of the claims that are spouted daily throughout the right wing echo chamber as if they were established facts:

Global warming isn’t real. Oh really? The overwhelming (95-plus percent) consensus of the scientific community is that it is ... and if that’s not enough, just ask some of our South Pacific friends who are now making plans for mass evacuation as their islands start to flood.

President Obama is a Muslim who was born in Kenya. Give me a break, we’ve seen the proof on both points.

President Obama is a socialist. Right, one who left all the big banks intact in 2009 after they nearly crashed the world economy, and appointed Timothy Geithner as treasury secretary instead of Paul Krugman or Joseph Stiglitz.

Evolution is an unproven theory. Yeah, just like the theory of gravity, or that Earth is round.

Trickle-down economics creates good jobs. Oh, like all those we created in the Bush years?

I could go on, but the grand prize for sheer ignorance and stupidity has to go to the idea that women who are raped have some mysterious biological mechanism that keeps them from getting pregnant. U.S. House of Representative member from Missouri Todd Akin has been thrown under the Republican bus for using the phrase “legitimately raped” to refer to this nonsense, but vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan co-sponsored a bill using the almost identical term “forcibly raped,” and Dr. John Willke, the quack who put forward this idiotic concept in the first place, was actually a Romney surrogate in 2008.

What really scares me, however, is the fact that Rep. Akin – a man so lacking in analytical skills and objectivity that he doesn’t seem to understand how babies are made – was chosen by the House Republican leadership to sit on ... what else ... the Science and Technology Committee.

Even scarier for Guam is that Akin is also chairman of the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Seapower and Projection of Forces – a crucial position for the buildup and all other Pacific-related defense policy.

Fortunately, the Republican leaders I’ve met on Guam are much more in the mold of traditional conservatives than Akin-style radicals. I do hope that the governor in Florida – and Frank Blas, if he should be elected – will put a high priority on lobbying for his replacement by someone with a little more common sense.

Comments  

 
0 #8 john smith 2012-08-28 09:45
`

David:


As the owner of an opinion column, you have the advantage of using hundreds even a thousand words to express your opinion. To post a different opinion, I am limited to 1500 characters. If I paraphrase or do a copy / paste and exceed 1500 characters, I am forced to post a 2nd or 3rd comment.


This would force readers to read from bottom up, and makes my post less effective.


In the same space that you post one paragraph, I can post 5-6 links. This allows the reader to view the author, and they can decide to continue or not.


The objective is to present different points of view by acclaimed journalists and to encourage comment and dialog. It makes sense to find the best way to present the different journalists articles to our readers. Posting links accomplishes this.


hasta


Talkers are usually more articulate than doers, since talk is their specialty....T. Sowell


`
 
 
+1 #7 David Jay Morris 2012-08-27 15:21
John,

As I just wrote in another post...

I think that everyone on the boards would take your comments more seriously if you would take the time to demonstrate that you yourself have grasped the issues involved in this (or any other) topic by presenting your opinions in your own words, not by linking to external sources.

Sorry to say it, but that is a very intellectually lazy approach to take, and one which disrespects the other readers.

If you think that these sources have something valuable to say, why not summarize it yourself instead of expecting everyone else to do your work for you?

- David

P.S. - As for my source on 95%+ (actually 97 - 98%), for a start I could cite the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, although to be precise I should say that this percentage is for real scientists actually working in the field of climate science.
 
 
-3 #6 john smith 2012-08-26 18:57
`

NASA says we ain't getting warmer !

http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/07/28/nasa-exposed-global-warming-hoax/

hast[censored]
 
 
-3 #5 john smith 2012-08-26 18:52
`

Another good article

http://www.globalwarminghysteria.com/ten-myths-of-global-warming/

hast[censored]
 
 
-3 #4 john smith 2012-08-26 18:46
#

Forbes Magazine does not support Global Warming.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/05/31/sorry-global-warming-alarmists-the-earth-is-cooling/

hast[censored]
 
 
-3 #3 john smith 2012-08-26 18:41
David, you state that 95% of scientists support the globel warming theory ? Can you site your source.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204301404577171531838421366.html

The Wall Street Journal does not agree with you

hast[censored]
 
 
-2 #2 john smith 2012-08-26 18:34
`
Is Obama a Muslim ? Click on the video, watch all 9 minutes of it. Pay attention to the 1:00 minute part

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzY&feature=player_detailpage

hasta
 
 
+1 #1 Mathew 2012-08-24 07:49
it is a misnomer to imply that the recent controversy about Rep. Akin is about one man. It is not. It is about the 2012 GOP. You have suggested on more than one occasion, as well, that local Republicans are not in the mold of some national Republicans. Even if you are correct, the fact remains that local Republicans are bound (or to put it not so nicely, "enslaved") by the national GOP. They cannot step out of bounds lest they be treated like a pariah among their counterparts.

It is a little like how mainstream, moderate Republicans have been afraid of challenges from the hard-right in their respective primaries so much so that the former have had to take up hard-right positions that are unpopular even among rank and file Republicans in red states. Case in point: The 'personhood' amendment in Mississippi, a dark red state, was defeated in 2011. Another case in point: The author of Arizona's SB 1070 immigration law was recalled in an election in 2011, by another Republican. But did the national Republicans steer away from hard-right positions even if voters in red states steered away from them at the ballot box? No.

Why? They are panderers, not unlike local Democrats who pandered to those who opposed the build-up simply because some of those who opposed the build-up thought/believed that the build-up would have brought more non-native folk on-island. Not realizing, of course, that the U.S. military is browning, a demographic term, like America.
 

Please Login to post a comment.