12 23Sun05262013

Settings

Font Size

Back Opinion Bring back early voting

Bring back early voting

  • PDF

AS THE Legislature prepares to tackle a major revision of Title 3 Guam Code Annotated, relative to conducting elections, there is a community service we would like to see them restore. That is early voting.

We opposed the repeal of this convenience to voters when it was brought up early last year. Hundreds of Guam voters took advantage of the opportunity to cast their ballots up to 30 days ahead of the actual day of election for several election cycles, reducing congestion at the polls and allowing at least some people to vote who otherwise might not have.

We said the Legislature should be making it easier for people to vote, not more difficult. The chapter removed from the Guam Code, number 10129, was even called “the early voting service to the community.” And indeed it was a useful service. Voters went to the Guam Election Commission office in Hagåtña, asked for a ballot, and voted. They did not need to state an excuse, which had previously been required to obtain an absentee ballot. In some jurisdictions, this service is even called “no excuse” early voting.

Unfortunately, the lawmakers saw fit to remove early voting from the law, and Gov. Eddie Calvo signed the bill. So after only a few years in step with the majority of U.S. states, which allow early voting, we took a step backward. We’re not aware of any widespread or pervasive abuse of the early voting privilege, although anecdotally there certainly were stories of voters casting an early ballot and then showing up at the polls on Election Day to vote again.

But that sort of violation is relatively easy to police and prevent. Much more significant was the expansion of the franchise the early voting law engendered. Many people who would be working on Election Day voted early, as did numerous elderly and infirm voters for whom standing in long lines on Election Day might be difficult. Parties and proponents of propositions organized transportation to get their supporters to the GEC office to vote early, and we saw nothing wrong with that.

We understand such voters can still vote by absentee ballot, but the process for justifying and obtaining such a ballot is cumbersome and, for some, onerous. It was much easier to just go to the election office and vote early. In fact, we had hoped the early voting privilege might be expanded to include the mayors’ offices.

Next week, as senators continue their discussions on Bill 413, we encourage them to bring up the question of early voting once more. In this computer and Internet age, jurisdictions throughout the country, and indeed the world, are simplifying the voting process and allowing properly registered voters to cast their ballots early. Guam should encourage that trend, not discourage it. Restore early voting!

Comments  

 
-1 #3 john smith 2012-02-10 09:03
:D :D

Germany No legal regulations about such a blackout period

Germany has no such 30 dat blackout period. Sorry Sharkfin, you are wrong !

:lol:

" Failure is not the worst thing in the world, the worst is not to try "


Hasta

/
 
 
0 #2 Mathew 2012-02-10 04:52
I think the folks who do not particularly like early voting are the ones who tend to depend on swaying the electorate's views late, through negative ads and whisper campaigns. The logic being that it would be difficult for their opponents to counter those arguments, usually false or petty or both, successfully. Most of those who go to vote early are not necessarily independents, but those in the base and since those in the latter group have already made up their minds, there is no need to wait until Election Day. Now, of course, there is always the possibility that some new fact or detail about a particular candidate or gubernatorial team that might be viewed negatively may arise late, like the weekend preceding Election Day, which might sway the undecideds, real or fictional, one way or the other. To which I say, if you cannot have dug have enough dirt about your opponent by then, forget about using it late. There is a reason why in places like Germany there is a blackout period of negative ads as it destroys the fabric of democracy because those with ulterior intentions and motives who prey on a naive and unsuspecting electorate do better under these circumstances. I am not saying that the Guam electorate is not sophisticated enough to sniff out these types of activities, but in a place this close-knit where word of mouth takes precedence over ads in influencing the potential voter, ads do drive the conversation which in turn, drive the vote.
 
 
+1 #1 nita 2012-02-10 04:47
I agree with the early voting just make sure those employees of GEC including their legal counsel can easily be prosecuted for commiting fraud either by "commission or omission." Those employees in the last election not only left the early vote envelops unlocked, they allowed members of their falmilies to come in through the night opening the envelops and replacing those that voted for Gutierrez/Aguon. How do we know this very likely happened? Under oath John Blas and Sthephanie Chargualaf haven't a clue as to how many ballots were printed. Now if only the Ag and US Atty. stop being political and do their sworn duty and investigate. But NO they just ignore and sweep it under the carpet. If the AG and US Atty. won't do their job then the legislature should step in and bring the culprits in under oversight hearing and put them under oath so we may know the TRUTH. Demand the truth Jon and support the oversight hearing.
 

Please Login to post a comment.