12 23Sat05252013

Settings

Font Size

Back Opinion Sinister?

Sinister?

  • PDF

SPEAKER of the Legislature Judi Won Pat may have gone just a bit too far with her weekly address last Friday. In it she suggested that those in the community who are advocating a part-time Legislature are somehow motivated by a desire to transfer the power of the people to the wealthy and elite. “The objective is deceptive and sinister,” she said.

Strong words, coming from a member of that same elite. For that’s exactly what our small Legislature has become, a gathering of the political “elite” who consider their election to the office to be a full-time job, and immediately set out to milk the maximum benefit for themselves from the office. In responding to the suggestions, Speaker Won Pat completely ignores one of the main points of the critics of a full-time Legislature, namely that being a senator should not be a public job, it should be public service.

Those who hold the top-elected positions on Guam should not receive paid vacations, sick leave, retirement or any other sort of public employee benefit. They should be paid for their work and that’s all. The whole notion of elected officials getting paid time off, sick leave and a lump sum payment at the end of their term for unused “leave” is expensive nonsense. That’s what contributes to the concept of elected office as a career choice, something like going into engineering or business or medicine.

Having a part-time Legislature would encourage more people to run for office, not less. Some of the critics of a full-time Legislature suggest we should reduce the size of the body even further, to seven or nine members. We do not agree with that.

Consideration of changing the Organic Act, or writing a constitution, providing for two chambers would also be a good idea.

The Mayors Council, whose members are much closer to the grass roots than the senators, could be the lower house.

By having a Legislature that meets only once or twice a year – with lawmakers paid a per diem stipend rather than a salary with benefits – we could save some money and encourage those elected to the body to go out into the community and work at a real job. That way, they are more likely to understand and fully appreciate what the community needs and wants.

There is nothing deceptive or sinister about advocating a part-time Legislature. On the contrary, it is an effort to reduce the cost and improve relevance of the lawmaking body. That’s a public discussion worth having.

 

Comments  

 
+3 #9 Ron McNinch 2012-02-02 12:26
very nice article. Notice that Wonpat made an overlapping address to try to back off from her silly speech. We deserve better from our senators.
 
 
+2 #8 masakada 2012-02-02 04:03
By the way, I am so disappointed in Speaker Won Pat. Her choice of words, her demeanor has been totally self serving... misrepresenting the majority of the people of Guam. She is definitely not being re-elected.
 
 
+2 #7 masakada 2012-02-02 03:51
I like your suggestion on having two chambers partake in writing the Organic Act; the Senate and Mayors Council. Yes, the Mayors communicate village people.

A vote for part time legislature should be placed in the ballot. Term limits should be placed at 2 consecutive terms with a four year break in order to run again. Travel and per diem should be defined and scrutinized. They are public servants, and should honor the wish of the people. Quality reps will surface.
 
 
0 #6 MVGuam Editor 2012-01-30 17:29
Quoting john smith:
I cannot find the dave davis column ?

It's in the drop down menu under Opinion...the Outside perspective.
 
 
+1 #5 john smith 2012-01-30 14:32
I cannot find the dave davis column ?
 
 
+6 #4 Dale 2012-01-30 13:00
I think we should have both a part time legislature and term limits of two years. With the term limits they should have a four year break before they could run again.
 
 
+5 #3 Dave Duenas 2012-01-30 11:40
Like the term of a Governor they can only be elected to two consecutive terms. Should be the same for a senator.
 
 
+6 #2 Dave Duenas 2012-01-30 11:38
I would also say we should put it to a vote by the people to limit the terms of an elected official such as a senator to two or three consecutive terms. This would allow for new faces and new ideas in the legislature!

Former Senator Al Ysrael has been a advocate of this and I for one agree, its time to change the law and limit the number of consecutive years a senator can stay in office.
 
 
+6 #1 john smith 2012-01-30 08:01
21 senators, meeting 3 times a year, work from their homes or have a common office with shared staff, secretaries, file clerks etc. salary of $15,000 per year.
 

Please Login to post a comment.