12 23Thu05232013

Settings

Font Size

Back Local News McCain hits Guam

McCain hits Guam

  • PDF
  • Prev
  • 1 of 2
  • Next

SEN. John McCain, one of the most senior and powerful senators in the U.S. Congress, has slammed Guam anew, criticizing the funding allotted for Guam in the Consolidated and Continuing Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2013.

In a joint statement with Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., McCain said Congress can’t afford to spend more than $1 trillion in federal tax dollars as budget sequestration continues to strain the U.S. military.

“As we draw closer to the ‘devastating’ effects on our military readiness as foreseen by our former Secretary of Defense, members of Congress have an even more profound responsibility to account for every taxpayer dollar. Every dollar we waste through pork barrel spending today is a dollar not spent to support our troops and preserve our nation’s security,” McCain said.

McCain said the planned appropriation for Guam directly contravenes the fiscal year 2013 National Defense Authorization bill by providing $120 million for civilian infrastructure in Guam, which both the House and Senate Armed Services Committees explicitly prohibited until a sufficient cost analysis of the proposed movement of troops from Okinawa to Guam is completed.

“After reviewing this legislation for less than 24 hours, it is clear that our suspicions were well justified. The bill contains numerous examples of egregious pork barrel projects as well as hundreds of millions in spending that was never authorized by the appropriate committee and not requested by the administration,” McCain said.

Bordallo response

Responding to McCain’s statement, Guam Delegate Madeleine Z. Bordallo said the funding for Guam infrastructure projects, specifically water and wastewater treatment systems on the island, has been identified by several federal agencies as critical to supporting and sustaining a robust military presence on Guam.

“The water and wastewater system is nearing capacity and is impacted by the current military population on Guam. The previous EIS (environmental impact study) regarding the realignment of Marines from Okinawa to Guam made this exact point – the current system is near capacity and needs upgrades,” Bordallo said.

Moreover, Bordallo said the request for a public health laboratory is critical to ensuring that significant bio-hazard threats are identified on Guam in a more timely fashion, thereby decreasing the possibility of this threat spreading to Hawaii or the U.S. mainland.

“Apparently Sen. McCain did not closely read the text of his own Defense authorization bill. Section 2832 prohibits the expenditure of civilian infrastructure funding unless there is a specific authorization. Department of Defense lawyers, and most legal scholars, would agree that the language contained in the Consolidated and Continuing Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2013 is sufficient to achieve the authorizing language threshold. This legislation is not ignoring the language in the authorization bill; rather it is correcting a flaw in the authorization bill and doing what is right to support the realignment of Marines to Guam as well as the current military population,” Bordallo pointed out.

‘No sense of history’

Furthermore, Bordallo described McCain “as lacking a sense of history.” She pointed out that Congress has, in several instances, specifically funded civilian infrastructure needs in other portions of the country. Specifically, a CSIS report on the Asia-Pacific rebalance, released in July 2012, highlighted that the Department of Defense should fund certain civilian infrastructure projects.

In subsequent testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, Bordallo said the authors of the report indicated that historically the Department of Defense has funded civilian infrastructure needs at Kings Bay, Ga., and at Bangor, Wash.

“Congress and Department of Defense had the foresight to recognize these two locations were strategically important to the United States and the basing of ballistic missile submarines. In order to achieve this strategic imperative, the Department of Defense and Congress recognized the need to ensure the civilian infrastructure could support and sustain their military populations,” Bordallo said.

If Congress is to support the strategic imperative to rebalance the U.S. military posture in the Asia-Pacific region, Bordallo said it is critical to support civilian infrastructure on Guam.

“I believe this appropriation measure matches rhetoric with actions. It supports the rebalance and provides the necessary support to sustain that rebalance with actual funding. Sen. McCain seems content to say he supports the rebalance without actually putting money into critical needs for the Guam realignment,” Bordallo said.

“Along these lines, I would also note that Sen. McCain supported legislative language in previous Defense authorization bills that called for civilian ‘outside the fence’ infrastructure to be addressed first before any Marines move to Guam. I could not agree more with this assessment and I believe that the Consolidated and Continuing Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2013 addresses key and critical infrastructure upgrades on Guam. If we support the rebalance to Asia, including the realignment of Marines from Okinawa, then support for civilian infrastructure is needed. It is important to make this modest investment now to ensure the long-term viability of this forward military presence on Guam for decades to come,” Bordallo added.

Comments  

 
-2 #13 Bill Gibson 2013-03-14 23:38
McCain and Duncan just learned that Guam has no debt and a $10 million surplus -- they read about it in the Variety...
 
 
-2 #12 Isabel 2013-03-14 17:31
What's up guys :sigh: :-* :lol: :-* :cry: ?
 
 
-2 #11 Isabel 2013-03-14 17:29
Just drop this topic. We're tired of this issue.
 
 
+2 #10 Peter 2013-03-14 17:23
Bordallo can move to her new job as a manicurist or cutting hair and do hairdo style.
 
 
-3 #9 Mathew 2013-03-14 16:58
Folks do wonder why Sen. McCain, most especially, has taken a hardline against Guam as it relates to the civilian infrastructure funding support when he was not even one of the senators who was apparently "mauled" by those in leadership here. I have a theory, and it is just a theory:

Maybe Sen. McCain and others such as Sen. Coburn, who was instrumental in killing the last War Reps effort because he insisted on an offset, have caught wind of the various local programs here that benefit a certain class of people, either through lawsuits and/or through personal correspondence from concerned citizens. And they are not happy about the existence of such programs, and can only "payback" those in leadership here in this manner, by scuttling -- or delaying -- these projects.

Remember that the senators who were in that closed door meeting, Levin and Webb, are both history, politically. The latter is already out and Levin has said he is not seeking re-election. If the Senate flips in 2014, Sen. McCain becomes the Chair of the Armed Services Committee, and the rest might just become history as well.
 
 
0 #8 Mitch Stevens 2013-03-14 16:48
Quoting Hafa-gachong:
KING McCain and Coburn (R) has made it very clear, Guam will not be getting any fundings for the military buildup until they are satisfied. Congress woman Bordallo responded quickly with her dismay, but I'm wondering why Governor Calvo (R) has not said anything.

Military personnel do not:
Shop at Payless or purchase Calvo's Health Insurance. That's why.
 
 
-1 #7 Hafa-gachong 2013-03-14 13:40
KING McCain and Coburn (R) has made it very clear, Guam will not be getting any fundings for the military buildup until they are satisfied. Congress woman Bordallo responded quickly with her dismay, but I'm wondering why Governor Calvo (R) has not said anything.
 
 
-4 #6 Mitch Stevens 2013-03-14 12:28
Quoting voxmanguam:
@Mitch, sorry your comparison is Apples and Oranges. Kings Bay population far exceeds Guam's. And Bangor gets its power via the Haford Nuclear power grid in Hadford, WA. Built by the DoD during WWII to supply enriched Uranium for the first Atom Bomb. Guam relies on the equivalent of a Diesel Generator for its power. The US is drawing down its Nuclear sub force and repurposing some subs for other missions like SEAL infiltration, and non nuclear missle targeting. Meanwhile, Guam which has three of those subs forward deployed continues to be the failback position for Japan and Korea, both for logistics and Communications. NCTS Guam is part of the Theater Defense and advanced targeting system. The US negotiated an agreement to move the Marines out of Okinawa. Guam was the natural fall back position for that. So what part of EIS report did you not understand? Was it the part that said Guam's Water, waste and Electric grid cannot support itself much less the additional military personnel. Before you answer that , ask somebody on base why the Navy and AF have huge power gen plants on base?


Guess I was right. Hot off the press:
The U.S. Senate this morning adopted an amendment proposed by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to eliminate funding for Guam civilian infrastructure projects provided by the Consolidated and Continuing Appropriations Act.
 
 
-2 #5 Isabel 2013-03-14 11:29
Madeleine Bordallo should just take a manicure, pedicure, hairstyling and make-up job. Sen. McCain and the rest in the U.S. Senate has a valid reason to delay the military buildup. She's just wasting her time and effort to persuade the Department of Defense comparing Guam to Kings Bay, Giorgia and at the Bangor, Washington. The U.S. has priorities in their own U.S. mainland. If President Obama can imposed the 'SEQUESTRATION CUTS" and it is under his administrative power, so does the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Senate to move the plan on infrastructure in the year 2020 because of the reason which both the House and Senate Armed Services Committees explicitly prohibited until a sufficient cost analysis of the proposed movement of troops from Okinawa to Guam is completed. MADELEINE, OPEN YOUR EARS AND ACCEPT THE FACT ON WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ALONE!!! Why can't you just do your own private business manicuring, putting make-up and do hairstyle cut? You must be an expert on these. You seem not really fit to be our representative in Congress in Washington D.C. Don't push too hard when you cannot really push the U.S. senators when the decision made is firm and cannot be flexible. Once it is firm, it's firm!!!
 
 
-2 #4 voxmanguam 2013-03-14 10:11
@Mitch, sorry your comparison is Apples and Oranges. Kings Bay population far exceeds Guam's. And Bangor gets its power via the Haford Nuclear power grid in Hadford, WA. Built by the DoD during WWII to supply enriched Uranium for the first Atom Bomb. Guam relies on the equivalent of a Diesel Generator for its power. The US is drawing down its Nuclear sub force and repurposing some subs for other missions like SEAL infiltration, and non nuclear missle targeting. Meanwhile, Guam which has three of those subs forward deployed continues to be the failback position for Japan and Korea, both for logistics and Communications. NCTS Guam is part of the Theater Defense and advanced targeting system. The US negotiated an agreement to move the Marines out of Okinawa. Guam was the natural fall back position for that. So what part of EIS report did you not understand? Was it the part that said Guam's Water, waste and Electric grid cannot support itself much less the additional military personnel. Before you answer that , ask somebody on base why the Navy and AF have huge power gen plants on base?
 

Please Login to post a comment.